The Reinforced Treat-and-Extend Protocol for Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Retrospective Assessment of 24-Month Real-World Outcomes in France.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to evaluate the real-world outcomes of the reinforced treat-and-extend (RTE) protocol for the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration with intravitreal injections of aflibercept or ranibizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients from two tertiary ophthalmology centers in France initiating the RTE protocol between February 2018 and June 2021. The primary outcome was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 24 months. Secondary outcomes were change in central retinal thickness (CRT), recurrence, and management-related factors (injection interval, number of injections/consultations). Outcomes were additionally evaluated after protocol changes (strict versus modified RTE protocol groups). RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (72 eyes) were included (68% females; mean age 82.2 ± 7.8 years). After 24 months, mean BCVA significantly improved (65.22 ± 14 vs. 71.96 ± 13 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; p < 0.001) and CRT significantly decreased (388.6 ± 104 vs. 278.8 ± 51 µM; p < 0.001) with 21% of eyes showing signs of exudation. Over the 24 months, a mean total of 14.9 ± 4.0 injections and 8.6 ± 1.4 consultations were performed. Mean 24-month injection interval was 7.9 ± 2.3 weeks. Initial and 24-month ophthalmic outcomes for eyes in the strict (47%) versus modified (53%) groups were not significantly different, but mean time interval to first recurrence of disease activity was significantly shorter for the modified group (7.3 ± 2.4 vs. 9.9 ± 2.5 weeks; p < 0.001). Patients in the strict RTE group received significantly less injections (13.9 ± 3.6 vs. 16.5 ± 3.9; p = 0.006) and mean 24-month injection interval was significantly longer (9.5 ± 2.7 vs. 6.5 ± 2.1 weeks; p < 0.001). Consultation number was similar (8.5 ± 1.9 vs. 8.8 ± 1.6; p = 0.93). Treatment with aflibercept versus ranibizumab did not influence ophthalmic or management outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The RTE protocol, even when modified, reduced consultations but improved ophthalmic outcomes. The RTE protocol could reduce hospital visits and overall burden while also encouraging better patient compliance. Video Abstract available for this article. VIDEO ABSTRACT: Vincent Soler and François-Philippe Roubelat summarize the Reinforced Treat-and-Extend Protocol and main results (MP4 225022 KB).

Patterns of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for chorioretinal vascular diseases: Analysis of a nationwide claims database in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is currently considered the first-line treatment for chorioretinal vascular diseases in Japan, information regarding its treatment pattern is scarce. This study investigated the patterns of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for chorioretinal vascular diseases. METHODS: A health insurance claims database from acute care hospitals was used to estimate treatment intervals and continuation and drop-out rates regarding the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Patients aged ≥50 years diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration or aged ≥18 years diagnosed with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion were analyzed. RESULTS: Data were included for 76,535, 49,704, and 37,681 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion, respectively; exactly 8,111, 2,283, and 6,896 received the treatment, respectively. The mean and median interval ranges during the maintenance phase by treatment initiation year were 94-100 and 73-80, 111-120 and 98-102, and 97-103 and 87-93 days for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion, respectively, without any trend over time. A tendency to increase the treatment continuation rate was indicated in later years by Kaplan-Meier curves. The drop-out rate in the treatment initiation year (2016) was 32% from 63% (2009), 53% from 69% (2014), and 36% from 47% (2013) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For all these diseases, the treatment intervals did not change remarkably, and a tendency toward improved treatment continuation was suggested.

Effect of Pro Re Nata regimen with anti-VEGF on Type 3 Macular Neovascularization - Long term outcomes.

(348 words) Introduction: The purpose of this study is to investigate long-term outcomes of intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV). METHODS: This retrospective study included 19 eyes of 17 patients with nAMD and type 3 MNV treated with anti-VEGF IVI with a loading dose and PRN regimen. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), presence of macular intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF), flow area (FA), subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT) and macular atrophy (MA) were assessed at baseline (T0) and during follow up (T1, post loading phase; T2, one year; T3, two years, T4>2 years). The correlations between MA at the last follow-up and standard deviation (SD) values of CMT and CT during follow-up were assessed. The influence of the number of injections on the change in MA over time was also analysed. MA differences at T4 were assessed for pseudodrusen presence. RESULTS: BCVA improved significantly during follow-up (p=0.013) particularly increasing from baseline to post loading phase and then did not modify significantly thereafter. CMT significantly reduced from T0 to T1 and remained stable during follow-up (p = <0.001). MNV flow area showed a trend toward increase in the post loading phase that was not statistically significant (p=0.082) and CT decreased significantly during follow-up (p<0.001). MA changed significantly during follow-up (p<0.001) with significant increase from T0 to T3 and from T0 to T4 (p < 0.010). Cochrane Armitage test for trend showed a significant reduction (p=0.001) of macular IRF and SRF during follow-up. MA at T4 showed a significant positive correlation with SD (standard deviation) values of CMT (p=0.040) and CT (p=0.020). Indeed, the number of injections did not influence the change over time of MA (p=0.709). MA at T4 was not statistically significantly different between patients with pseudodrusen at baseline (p=0.497). CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections with PRN regimen in MNV type 3 showed functional and anatomical benefits. Variations of retinal thickness and choroidal thickness during treatment were related to MA modification over time.

Effect of intravitreal injections due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and minimum rim width: a cross sectional study.

PURPOSE: The present study tested the hypothesis that repeated anti-VEGF injections are associated with reduced retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and minimum rim width (MRW) of the optic nerve head. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with a history of intravitreal injections due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration were included. RNFL and MRW were measured using optical coherence tomography (Spectralis OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). RESULTS: Mean global RNFL was 90.62 µm and both RNFL as well as MRW significantly decreased with advanced age (p = 0.005 and p = 0.019, respectively). Correlating for the number of injections, no significant impact on RNFL was found globally (p = 0.642) or in any of the sectors. In contrast, however, global MRW was significantly reduced with increasing numbers of intravitreal injections (p = 0.012). The same holds true when adjusted for the confounding factor age (RNFL p = 0.566 and MRW p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that repeated intravitreal injections due to choroidal neovascularization seem to have a deleterious effect on MRW but not on RNFL. This suggests that MRW is a more sensitive marker than RNFL for evaluating the effect of frequent intravitreal injections on the optic nerve head since it seems to be the first structure affected.

The Economic Burden of Diabetic Retinopathy in Jordan: Cost Analysis and Associated Factors.

Objective: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of visual loss worldwide in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The aims of our study are to describe the costs associated with (DR) and to evaluate its economic impact in Jordan. Methods: Retrospectively, we included all patients with DM and classified them according to the severity of DR. Data regarding medical history, ophthalmic history, stage of DR, presence of DME, and the ophthalmic procedures and operations were collected. The total DR-related cost was measured as a direct medical cost for the outpatient and inpatient services. Results: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were included in the study. Only 49.7% of the patients presented without DR, and 21% presented with diabetic macular edema (DME) unilaterally or bilaterally. The DR-related cost was significantly associated with insulin-based regimens, longer duration of DM, higher HbA1c levels, worse stage of DR at presentation, the presence of DME at presentation, the presence of glaucoma, and increased mean number of intravitreal injections, laser sessions, and surgical operations. Multivariate analysis should the presenting stage of DR, presence of DME, and the presence of DME be the independent factors affecting the DR-related cost. Conclusion: This study is the first study to be conducted in Jordan and encourages us to establish a screening program for DR for earlier detection and treatment. DM control and treatment compliance will reduce the heavy costs of the already exhausted healthcare and financial system.

Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Intravitreal Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection Rates in Nigerians.

Aim: To quantify the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the rate of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (IVI) in eye hospitals in Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, observational, comparative study. The IVIs given 12 months before (pre-COVID) and 12 months after the first announcement of the COVID-19 lockdown (COVID) in Nigeria in four hospitals were used as the sample for this study. All eyes were treatment naïve. We determined the total number of all anti-VEGF injections, the number given for each indication, and the number of each type of the three anti-VEGFs given. A comparison of the presenting vision in IVI eyes between the two eras and the visual outcome of the IVI treatment was made. Data were analyzed using the SPSS version 22 to determine statistical significance. Results: Male/female ratio, pre-COVID 63.4%/36.6% and COVID 58.6%/41.4% (P = 0.123). Age, pre-COVID 61.3 (SD 12.9) 9-95 years and COVID 57.5 (SD 16.4) 0.15-95 years. There was a 15.3% (81 eyes) reduction in the number of eyes between pre-COVID and COVID eras (528 and 447 eyes, respectively). Likewise, the number of IVIs reduced by 26% (221 IVIs) from 850 pre-COVID to 629 COVID, P = 0.005. A comparison of the proportion of eyes in the four clinic locations between the two eras was not statistically significant (P = 0.148). The commonest indication was proliferative diabetic retinopathy in both eras, 208 versus 178 eyes (323 versus 226 IVIs). Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept were given in the following proportions 60.2%, 22.3%, and 17.4% (pre-COVID) versus 60.2%, 31.5%, and 8.3% (COVID), P = 0.000. Presenting visual acuity was >6/60 in 67.4% of eyes (pre-COVID) versus 59.4% of eyes (COVID), P = 0.039. Vision improved in 51.3% of eyes (pre-COVID) versus 47.7% (COVID); there was no significant difference in visual outcome comparing both eras, P = 0.972. Conclusion: COVID-19 significantly reduced the number of eyes and IVIs. Eyes had worse presenting visual acuity during the COVID era; however, treatment outcome was comparable between COVID and pre-COVID eras.

Primary Vitrectomy versus Tap and Inject for Fungal Endophthalmitis: Meta-Analysis and Comparison with Data from a Reference Centre.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the visual outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus tap and inject (T&I) in fungal endophthalmitis (FE) reported in the literature and to compare the findings from the literature with data from a reference centre. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the use of PPV versus T&I in FE. We also performed a retrospective review of the clinical records of patients with endophthalmitis from a reference centre in Colombia. RESULTS: We included 13 studies with 334 eyes; 53.59% received PPV and 46.4% received T&I. The overall relative risk of improving ≥ 2 lines in PPV versus T&I was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.22; p = 0.88) with a mean difference of final visual acuity of 0.26 (95% CI 0.12-0.63; p = 0.18). There were no significant differences in subgroup analysis. Data from the reference centre included 32 endophthalmitis cases, 15.6% of which had a fungal aetiology (80% received PPV and 20% T&I). There were no significant differences in the subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings from the literature and the reference centre, T&I is noninferior to PPV. This is the first meta-analysis in the literature evaluating these effects in FE. It is necessary to execute new prospective randomised controlled studies in patients with endophthalmitis.

Global experience of faricimab in clinical settings - a review.

INTRODUCTION: Faricimab is a bispecific antibody that acts to reduce neoangiogenesis in exudative retinal vascular disorders. It is approved for use in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. We review the published efficacy and safety of faricimab in clinical settings. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive literature review was conducted. Based on the 14 published real-world studies, 1127 patients (1204 eyes) were treated with faricimab. The majority of studies (14) included pre-treated patients. Most studies (13) showed central macular thickness improvement. However visual acuity improved in only half of the studies analyzed. Four studies demonstrated an extension of the treatment. Only 4 eyes (0.33%) reported intraocular inflammation and 3 eyes (0.24%) reported retinal pigment epithelial tear. EXPERT OPINION: The clinical experience with faricimab to date has the potential to provide a stable visual outcome with reduced treatment burden in cases that are resistant to other approved anti-VEGF agents. There are no major safety concerns based on this data analysis.

Perifoveal retinal thickness changes after intravitreal aflibercept injection for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: There has been some concern that anti-vascular growth factor treatment accelerates the development of macular atrophy in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. During the treatment with aflibercept, the thickness of choroid may decrease. This may lead to photoreceptor death. The rod cells are more susceptible to atrophic changes than cones during the disease. We aimed to find any thickness changes in the perifoveal outer nuclear layer, where the highest density of rods is found, during the aflibercept intravitreal injection therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, forty-two patients who were treated for age-related macular degeneration with choroidal neovascularization were included in the study. After the first three loading doses, intravitreal injections were repeated every two months. Outer nuclear layer thicknesses were measured 2000 µm away from the center of the fovea with OCT, at a total of 20 points, located at 180 and 90°. The mean of these measurements was obtained before the treatment and 1 year after the therapy. Results were compared by using the Wilcoxon Rank Test. RESULTS: The mean visual acuity was 1,11±0,287 logMAR at the beginning and increased to 0,53±0,32 LogMAR after. Perifoveal thickness was significantly reduced when compared with the thickness before the treatment (p = 0.039, p < 0.05). This result was also significantly lower than the control group thicknesses (p = 0.035, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGFs can cause loss of phagocytic functions of RPE. The mechanism of the observed thinning of the ONL may be described as follows: VEGF emitted by the RPE normally helps to maintain the choriocapillaris. Thus, injecting an anti-VEGF intravitreally causes RPE atrophy, which leads to a decrease in the choroidal vascular index. This in turn causes first the rods, and later the cones, that are part of the outer nuclear layer, to start to die and disappear, hence the thinning of this layer. As aflibercept consists of parts of the extracellular domain of both the VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 receptors, that are held together by a human IgG1 backbone, this makes the binding of aflibercept to VEGF-A and VEGF-B stronger as compared to the binding of the previously used ranibizumab or bevacizumab (by nearly a factor 100 in the case of the most abundant isoform VEGF-A 165). Besides, aflibercept also binds very well to placental growth factor (PIGF), which is also associated with several ocular diseases.

Tear cytokine levels are reduced in patients treated with intravitreal injections.

PURPOSE: To investigate cytokine levels in the tear fluid of patients receiving serial intravitreal injections (IVI) with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: Concentrations of six cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, TNF and VEGF) in tears of patients receiving anti-VEGF in one eye were assayed using multiplex cytometric bead array. The fellow untreated eye served as control. Tear sampling was performed on a single occasion at a minimum of four weeks after IVI. Patients underwent a pre-IVI antisepsis protocol with povidone-iodine. RESULTS: Tear fluid from thirty patients with a mean age of 78.8 years (range 58-90) was assayed. Subjects received a median of 43.5 (range 22-106) IVI in one eye. The median level of IFN-γ was 0.33 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.22-0.52) pg/mg of total protein in injected eyes versus 0.41 (IQR 0.21-1.05) pg/mg in fellow eyes (p = 0.017). For TNF, a median level of 0.12 (IQR 0.08-0.18) pg/mg of total protein was found in injected eyes versus 0.14 (IQR 0.07-0.33) pg/mg of total protein in fellow eyes (p = 0.019). There were no differences between injected and fellow eyes regarding the levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8 and VEGF. CONCLUSION: Tear fluid in eyes receiving serial IVI with anti-VEGF and preoperative povidone-iodine antisepsis constitutes lower levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and TNF compared to fellow eyes. This provides biochemical support of previous findings of reduced signs of inflammation and healthier tear film parameters in patients treated with serial IVI.

[Frequency and distribution of the active agent of intravitreal injections in German centers 2015-2021-An oregis study]. / Häufigkeit und Wirkstoffverteilung intravitrealer Injektionen in deutschen Zentren 2015 bis 2021 ­ eine oregis-Studie.

INTRODUCTION: Digitalization in medicine, especially the electronic documentation of patient data, is revolutionizing healthcare systems worldwide. The evaluation of real-world data collected under everyday conditions presents opportunities but also challenges. Electronic medical registries provide a means to compile extensive patient data for scientific inquiries. Oregis is the first nationwide digital registry for health services research established by the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG). Intravitreal operative medicinal injections (IVOM) are among the most frequently performed procedures in ophthalmology. Data on injection numbers and injection frequencies with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are already available from other countries, whereas data at a national level are not yet available in Germany due to the lack of a nationwide register. It is known that the treatment success of anti-VEGF IVOMs depends largely on the adherence to treatment and thus on the number of injections. There are also differences in cost. In the context of this study, real-world data on the frequency and distribution of intravitreal injections in German centers from 2015 to 2021 were compiled for the first time since the introduction of oregis. The aim of this study is to collect data on the use of anti-VEGF IVOMs in Germany from oregis for the first time and to show the development of injection numbers and anti-VEGF drugs used. At the same time, the possibilities of data retrieval from oregis are demonstrated using a concrete example from daily ophthalmological practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An automated query of records was performed for all patients who received IVOM at oregis-affiliated healthcare facilities between 2015 and 2021. The number of treated patients and the use of anti-VEGF medications, including aflibercept, bevacizumab, brolucizumab, and ranibizumab, were determined. The data were collected in a pseudonymized and anonymized manner. RESULTS: At the time of data collection, 9 German ophthalmological healthcare facilities were affiliated with oregis. In total, 309,152 patients were registered during the observation period, with 8474 receiving IVOMs. Over the observation period, the number of participating centers, patients, and intravitreal injections increased. The proportional share of anti-VEGF agents among the total number of injections varied during the observation period. DISCUSSION: Real-world data captured in oregis offer significant potential for enhancing healthcare provision. Oregis enables the depiction of ophthalmological care conditions in Germany and contributes to research and quality assurance. The ability to query the presented data exemplifies the multitude of inquiries through which oregis can contribute to the representation of ophthalmological care in Germany.

Influence of serial intravitreal injections on measures of dry eye: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of serial intravitreal injections (IVI) on measures of dry eye. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched according to the PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023455727). Studies evaluating the influence of serial IVI on the ocular surface compared with untreated fellow eyes were included. The measures of dry eye after IVI were used as outcome variables. The results are presented as mean difference (MD) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 4 studies with 259 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Significant increases in ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores (MD 10.26, 95 % CI 5.05 to 15.46, p ＜ 0.01) and tear film osmolarity (TOsm; MD 4.40, 95 % CI 0.87 to 7.92, p = 0.01) were observed in the IVI treated eyes compared to the untreated fellow eyes. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to fluorescein tear film break-up time (TBUT; p = 0.05), average non-invasive tear film break-up time (NITBUT; p = 0.94), first NITBUT (p = 0.78) and Schirmer test (p = 0.94). CONCLUSION: Repeated IVI of anti-VEGF agents with preoperative povidone-iodine application was associated with increased OSDI scores and TOsm, while no significant difference was found in fluorescein TBUT, average NITBUT, first NITBUT and Schirmer test. The ocular surface may partially recover after the procedures, but IVI still has deleterious effects on the ocular surface.

The carbon footprint and wastage of intravitreal injections.

PURPOSE: The healthcare system emits greenhouse gas emissions and produces waste that in turn threatens the health of populations. The objective of our study was to measure the ecological threat related to intravitreal injections. METHODS: Emissions were separated into scope 2 corresponding to Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) of the building, and scope 3 corresponding to travels (patients and staff), and life cycle assessment (LCA) of medical devices (MD) and pharmaceutics. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste for a single injection were first measured through a waste audit, and secondly anticipated theoretically with a calculator. RESULTS: The average GHG emissions and waste measured were 277kgCO2eq/IVI and 0.5kg/IVI, respectively. Pharmaceuticals were responsible for 97% of total emissions. Emissions unrelated to pharmaceuticals counted for 8.4kgCO2eq/IVI. GHG emissions and waste estimated with the calculator were 276kgCO2eq/IVI and 0.5kg/IVI, respectively, showing that the calculator was accurate. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a puzzle piece to carbon footprint and waste assessment in the field of ophthalmology. It may help provide concrete data for future green vs. vision discussions.

[Quality of life survey of 3,738 patients treated with intravitreal injections for age-related macular degeneration]. / Enquête de qualité de vie auprès de 3738 patients traités par injections intravitréennes pour leur dégénérescence maculaire liée à l'âge.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the peri- and post-intravitreal injection (IVI) symptoms reported by patients who have been repeatedly injected for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to analyze these according to the protocols of the injector. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-center, cross-sectional, consecutive, analytical survey. RESULTS: The IVI protocols of 106 injectors differed in terms of the number of instillations of povidone-iodine, its contact time, and rinsing of the ocular surface post-injection. In total, 3,738 patients responded to the survey, 60.1% of whom were women; 36.4% had received more than 20 IVIs; 50.7% of patients reported irritation upon application of povidone-iodine. Post-IVI, depending on the symptom in question, between 44.8% and 57.4% of patients reported symptoms of ocular surface change. The number of instillations of povidone-iodine, its contact time with the ocular surface, and abundant rinsing post-IVI increased the immediate symptoms. Patients who received more IVIs were more prone to experiencing gritty eyes, and the incidence of acute pain increased in patients who had previously received over 20 IVIs. Women and patients previously treated for dry eye or glaucoma were at greater risk of worse symptoms. CONCLUSION: Comparing injecting centers' practices with patients' self-assessments showed an aggravation of symptoms of ocular surface changes related to povidone-iodine. This survey contributes to providing data for the implementation of a protocol to improve the quality of life of patients injected repeatedly for AMD.

Disease quiescence in endophthalmitis patients treated with anti-VEGF injections for retinal pathologies.

BACKGROUND: The most feared complication of intravitreal injections is the development of endophthalmitis, which could lead to irreversible visual loss. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical profiles, causative pathogens, and clinical outcome of patients post-endophthalmitis. METHODS: Retrospective, single center case series study. Clinical records, causative pathogens and management of all cases of endophthalmitis post intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections recorded between January 1st, 2006 and May 30th, 2022; were retrieved. The visual and anatomic changes prior to the episode of endophthalmitis and up to 2 years post-treatment were compared. RESULTS: Eleven post-injection endophthalmitis eyes of 10 patients (n = 3 females; 30%) were recruited at mean age of 64.5 ± 20.4 years. The median last recorded BCVA, up to 3 months prior to the episode of endophthalmitis was 60 (Interquartile range (IQR) 55-75) ETDRS letters. Then, it dropped to 30 (IQR 0-57.5), 35 (IQR 0-52.5) and 35 (IQR 0-57.5) ETDRS letters at presentation, 6- and 12-months follow-up; respectively (p = 0.027, p = 0.017 and p = 0.012). However, at 24 months, the median BCVA returned to similar baseline values prior to the episode of endophthalmitis; BCVA 50 (IQR 0-60) ETDRS letters, p = 0.062. Interestingly, two eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD), 1 with myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and 1 with retinal vein occlusion (RVO), experienced disease quiescence and did not require additional anti-VEGF injections up to 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates long-term recovery of vision loss due to endophthalmitis post anti-VEGF injections, regained up to 2 years later. It also indicates that disease quiescence post endophthalmitis may not only occur in eyes treated for NVAMD, but also with myopic CNV and RVO.

A Prospective Observational Study on Clinical Profile and Visual Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Background and objectives Over the years, several treatment options have been developed for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the most notable being intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs. The rationale for treating neovascular AMD is to preserve and improve central vision, enhance the quality of life for affected individuals, stabilize or improve vision, and prevent further structural damage to the macula. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical course of different disease types of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and their treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care referral hospital in Eastern India during October 2019 and September 2021. Patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD attending our Outpatient department and retina clinic were recruited for the study. An experienced ophthalmologist examined all patients, meeting the inclusion criteria. The clinical profile, including initial best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmoscopic, fluorescein angiographic, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings of different patterns of neovascular AMD, were collected and analyzed. Patients were subjected to intravitreal Ranibizumab every month for three months and then on a when-required basis. Visual outcomes were recorded at each follow-up, and a comparison was done between initial and final visual acuity. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis, with p< 0.05 taken as statistically significant. Results A total of 72 patients were included in the study. Fundus fluorescein angiography revealed that 52.78% were classic, 15.28% were minimally classic, and 31.94% were of occult variety. 41.66% of lesions were subfoveal in location, 47.22% were juxtafoveal, and 11.11% lesions were extrafoveal in location. The mean BCVA was Log MAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) 1.061±0.25. The average number of intravitreal Ranibizumab injections given to each eye was five. BCVA of patients after the third injection was log MAR 0.818±0.296. There was a significant improvement in mean BCVA from baseline 1.061±0.254 to 0.787±0.317 after the study (p-valve: p<0.05). After the first injection, 49 patients (68.05%) experienced an initial improvement of at least one line, 20 patients (27.77%) did not exhibit any improvement, and 3 patients (4.16%) had a decline of one line in Snellen's visual acuity chart. Over the follow-up period,10 showed improvement in 1 line in the Snellen chart after subsequent injection. At the end of the study, six patients showed no change, and four patients showed deterioration after the completion of injections. No adverse events were noted during the study period. Conclusions Intravitreal Ranibizumab is effective in improving visual outcomes in treatment-naïve individuals with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The decision for repeat intravitreal anti-VEGF injection should be based on OCT findings of subretinal fluid, pigment epithelial detachment, and cystoid macular edema as an indicator of disease activity. This can also lessen the number of intravitreal injections and morbidity in these patients.

Increasing trends in the use of the Precivia® intravitreal injection assist device across the UK.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the most frequently performed outpatient procedure in the UK, the need for which continues to rise. To meet this demand, injection assist devices such as Precivia® are increasingly adopted to aid in their prompt and safe delivery. We present data on the usage of Precivia® intravitreal injection assist device across two district general hospitals and its distribution across the UK over five years. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all Precivia® assisted intravitreal injections delivered at Great Western Hospitals NHS Trust (GWH), and Gloucestershire and Cheltenham Hospitals NHS Trust (GCH) between 2015-2020. Data were also obtained from the Precivia® device UK distributor; Veni Vidi Medical. RESULTS: In GCH, 47,968 intravitreal injections were administered with Precivia®: 5947 in year 1; 7058 in year 2; 9893 in year 3; 11,503 in year 4 and 13,567 injections in year 5, observing a 128.13% increase in the use of Precivia® over the five-year-period. In GWH, 26,923 injections were administered with Precivia®: 4232 in year 1; 5117 in year 2; 5437 in year 3; 5878 in year 4 and 6259 in year 5, observing a 47.89% increase in Precivia® injections over a five-year study period. The number of Precivia® devices distributed across the UK similarly increased including 42,150 devices sold in 2015; 68,125 in 2016; 72,575 in 2017; 88,325 in 2018; 112,850 in 2019 and 115,125 in 2020 observing a 173.31% increase in five years. CONCLUSION: An increasing trend in the use of the Precivia® intravitreal injection assist device was observed across the UK.

[Iatrogenic retinal defects after intravitreal operative drug injections]. / Iatrogene Netzhautdefekte nach intravitrealer operativer Medikamenteneingabe.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal operative drug injections represent one of the most frequently performed medical interventions. The risk profile is low. In addition to intraocular pressure elevation, the most frequent complications include exogenous endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Furthermore, isolated cases of lens injuries, macular holes associated with vitreoretinal traction and peripheral retinal defects have been described. In the present case series sharp iatrogenic macular and retinal defects are described. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter case collection of patients with iatrogenic retinal defects after intravitreal injections from 2016 to 2023. RESULTS: Iatrogenic retinal trauma after intravitreal injections for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration was identified in 9 cases (72 years ± 8.1, 3 eyes pseudophakic). While sharp injuries within the macula occurred in six cases, extramacular lesions were detected in the other cases. CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic retinal and macular injuries are rare complications of intravitreal injections and when correctly carried out are preventable, especially with respect to use of cannulas and the choice of the distance from the limbus.

Effect of intralenticular dexamethasone implant: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant is indicated for the treatment of macular oedema due to diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion and uveitis. The most common complications are cataract and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Accidental injection of DEX implant into the lens is a rare complication and only few papers presented it. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old man was treated with DEX implant for diabetic macular oedema in both eyes. At 1 week follow-up visit, slit lamp examination showed the DEX implant was located in the crystalline lens of the right eye (RE) without any sign of inflammation, cataract or elevated IOP, so we decided to plan a normal follow-up schedule. Macular oedema relapsed 5 months after the injection in the left eye (LE), whereas the RE did not show any sing of intraretinal or subretinal fluid. Six months after DEX implantation an uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens placement were performed in the RE because of IOP elevation. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic effect of DEX implant can be maintained for a longer period of time than intravitreal implant, determining complete reabsorption of macular oedema. Intralenticular implant can be maintained inside the lens until either IOP increases, cataract progresses, or other complications occur.

Is diabetic retinopathy screening worthwhile among people first diagnosed with diabetes at older ages? A cohort study of Norfolk diabetic retinopathy screening programme.

AIMS: England's Diabetic Eye Disease Screening Programme offers screening to every resident over age 12 with diabetes, starting as soon as possible after diagnosis and repeated annually. People first diagnosed with diabetes at older ages have shorter life expectancy and therefore may be less likely to benefit from screening and treatment. To inform decisions about whether diabetic eye screening policy should be stratified by age, we investigated the probability of receiving treatment according to age at first screening episode. METHODS: This was a cohort study of participants in the Norfolk Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme from 2006 to 2017, with individuals' programme data linked to hospital treatment and death data recorded up to 2021. We estimated and compared the probability, annual incidence and screening costs of receiving retinal laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injection and of death, in age groups defined by age at first screening episode. RESULTS: The probability of death increased with increasing age at diagnosis, while the probability of receiving either treatment decreased with increasing age. The estimated cost of screening per person who received either or both treatments was £18,608 among all participants, increasing with age up to £21,721 in those aged 70-79 and £26,214 in those aged 80-89. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic retinopathy screening is less effective and less cost-effective with increasing age at diagnosis of diabetes, because of the increasing probability of death before participants develop sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy and can benefit from treatment. Upper age limits on entry into screening programmes or risk stratification in older age groups may, therefore, be justifiable.